Read the reasoning.
See why the passage was flagged and how it relates to the manuscript’s methods, evidence or interpretation.
Revision Assistant
Understand the concern. Consider the suggested wording. Make a revision you can stand behind.
Start Free Private by design. Not used to train AI.Finding & revision
A retrospective study supports further evaluation. It does not establish performance in an independent clinical population.
The panel shows potential for further clinical evaluation in an independent population.
A starting point. Check it against your study.Illustrative guidance · your original manuscript stays unchanged
Understand the concern
Make an informed revision
Upload and re-review
From concern to change
Good revision starts with understanding the issue. Keep the evidence in view, consider what needs to change and use wording suggestions where they help.
See why the passage was flagged and how it relates to the manuscript’s methods, evidence or interpretation.
Copy or adapt a wording suggestion where one is provided. Some concerns require an analysis or more evidence, not a different sentence.
Re-review & compare
Upload your revision and see how the findings have changed. Each review round remains available, so you can read the explanation behind what is resolved and what still needs attention.
A new review assesses the uploaded revision against the previous report.
The wording now limits the claim to the evidence reported. Clinical validation is still unestablished.
Feature selection is clarified. The treatment of preprocessing within each fold still needs explanation.
How it works
Read the original passage, the explanation and the suggested action together.
Use suggested wording when available. Make the change in your own editor and check that it reflects your research.
Submit the revised version of the same paper. Compare the new findings and return to earlier reports when needed.
FAQ
No. Read the explanation, copy suggested wording where available, and make changes in your own manuscript editor. You decide whether to use, adapt or ignore any suggestion.
No. Some concerns need more evidence, a clarification or a change to the analysis. The report provides actions to consider; suggested wording appears where it is appropriate.
Upload the revised version of the same manuscript for another review. The new report can compare findings with the previous version, including resolved, partly resolved, remaining and newly identified concerns, with an explanation of the assessment.
After you unlock a manuscript, re-reviews of that same manuscript are included. A separate research paper needs its own manuscript credit. There is no subscription.
Ready when you are
Turn review findings into clear, evidence-aligned changes.
Start Free Explore Manuscript Checker